Practical Examples
See how Bayes' Theorem reveals surprising truths and clarifies complex questions
Counter-Intuitive Scenarios
These examples demonstrate how our intuitions about probability can be dramatically wrong. Test your gut feeling, then see what the mathematics reveals.
The Medical Test Paradox
A rare disease affects 0.1% of the population (1 in 1,000 people). There's a highly accurate test:
- 99% sensitivity: detects the disease 99% of the time when present
- 99% specificity: correctly identifies healthy people 99% of the time
You test positive. What's the probability you actually have the disease?
The Monty Hall Problem
You're on a game show with three doors. Behind one is a car, behind the others are goats. You pick Door 1.
The host (who knows what's behind each door) opens Door 3, revealing a goat. He then asks:
"Do you want to switch to Door 2, or stick with Door 1?"
What gives you the better chance of winning the car?
The Taxi Cab Problem
A city has two taxi companies:
- • Green Cabs: 85% of all taxis
- • Blue Cabs: 15% of all taxis
A taxi was involved in a hit-and-run at night. A witness identified it as Blue. The court tested the witness's ability to identify taxi colors at night and found they were correct 80% of the time.
What's the probability the taxi was actually Blue?
Advanced Applications
Beyond counter-intuitive puzzles, Bayes' Theorem helps us understand complex real-world questions where different starting assumptions lead to different conclusions—even when everyone agrees on the evidence.
The Resurrection Question: How Priors Shape Conclusions
This example demonstrates one of the most important insights from Bayesian reasoning: rational people can reach different conclusions from the same evidence when they start with different prior beliefs.
Consider the historical question: Did Jesus of Nazareth rise from the dead? Let's examine how three different perspectives—each using valid Bayesian reasoning—reach dramatically different conclusions.
Note: This example is purely educational and demonstrates mathematical reasoning. We present multiple perspectives respectfully without advocating for any particular position.